Editor’s note: This article is part of the Bracket Central series, an inside look at the run-up to the men’s & women’s NCAA Tournaments, along with analysis and picks during the tournaments.
Over the next two months, get ready to hear the word “bubble” more than you do in the other 10 months of the year combined. It’s a staple of bracketology and March Madness seeding. The term “bubble” simply means a team is right on the edge of being seeded.
Advertisement
The bubble is officially made up of 16 squads. The last four teams that will receive a bye, the last four teams that will earn bids, the first four teams to barely miss the cut and the next four that also have a chance. When comparing these teams, head-to-head matchups, good wins and bad losses play a major role.
These 16 teams are currently on bubble watch. Here’s who would be in and who would be out if the season ended today:
|
Last four byes |
Last four in |
First four out |
Next four out |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Iowa State |
Colorado |
Virginia |
Miami |
|
Stanford |
Utah |
Clemson |
Arizona State |
|
Villanova |
BYU |
Richmond |
Cal |
|
Syracuse |
Virginia Tech |
Seton Hall |
San Diego State |
Iowa State
Technically, Iowa State is on the bubble, but I don’t think Cyclones fans have too much to worry about. Five straight losses to Baylor, Cincinnati, West Virginia, Colorado and Oklahoma State put the Cyclones in a precarious position, but a win against Texas Tech last week got them back on track. Plus, the committee will take into account that the losses happened when Arianna Jackson and Addy Brown were injured. Jackson has since returned, and while Brown is “out indefinitely,” she should be back at some point this season.
Advertisement
The Cyclones also still have a shot to work their way into a higher seed with a game against TCU in a few weeks. A win would certainly boost their resume. Iowa State is currently in the No. 8-, 9- and 10- seed conversation.
Stanford
Overall, the Cardinal have a solid resume, sitting at 36 in the NET rankings and 33 in strength of schedule. They have wins over Washington, Oregon and North Carolina, all of which are currently in the field. However, those wins occurred earlier in the season, and the committee puts a higher value on recent results. Stanford has lost its last four games to Syracuse, Louisville and Notre Dame (all current March Madness squads) and California, another bubble team. If the season ended today, Stanford would still be in, likely as a 10 or 11 seed, and avoid a play-in game. But the Cardinal will need to have a better showing in the back half of ACC play to keep that bid.
Colorado
The Buffaloes get a significant resume boost thanks to their strength of schedule, which ranks 20th in the NCAA. Their best win came against Iowa State on Jan. 14, and the Buffs also played close against Baylor — a team projected to host in the first round — losing by just four points, 56-52. Though Stanford dropped into the bubble because of its recent losses, Colorado has catapulted into the field because of its recent wins. The Buffs have won four of their last five, including victories over Iowa State and Oklahoma State.
BYU
A win over Texas Tech on Jan. 21 did wonders for BYU’s resume. It’s their best win of the season by far. The Cougars are 16-6 on the season with no bad losses — something the committee will value — and wins over three other bubble teams. They recently defeated Utah, one of the last four teams in, and have a win over Virginia Tech, another last-four team, from earlier in the season. The Texas Tech win, plus a head-to-head victory, gives BYU a boost over fellow Big 12 bubble squad Arizona State.
Advertisement
Arizona State
First-year head coach Molly Miller led Arizona State to a 15-0 start, the best in program history. The streak included solid victories over Colorado and Utah, both fellow bubble teams. However, in this case, the head-to-head wins don’t give Arizona State the edge because Colorado and Utah have better overall resumes. Colorado’s recent success — a win over Iowa State and a higher NET ranking — gives the Buffs an edge. Utah, meanwhile, has a better NET and a much better strength of schedule (15 to Arizona State’s 63). The Utes also beat TCU and West Virginia, while Arizona State has yet to record a signature win.
Richmond
Mid-major squads have to be nearly perfect to earn at-large bids. Few opportunities for major wins exist in conference play and bad losses carry heavy consequences. The Spiders put together a challenging nonconference schedule, playing Texas, TCU and fellow top mid-major Fairfield. Unfortunately for Richmond, all three games resulted in losses. The Spiders are currently third in the A-10, behind an excellent Rhode Island squad and George Mason. All three teams are talented enough, eye test-wise, to be in the field of 68, but the system is not set up to benefit mid-majors. Richmond will likely need to win the A-10 to secure a bid.
The Bracket Central series is sponsored by E*Trade from Morgan Stanley. The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Sponsors have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication.
Advertisement
This article originally appeared in The Athletic.
Arizona State Sun Devils, Stanford Cardinal, Colorado Buffaloes, BYU Cougars, Richmond Spiders, Iowa State Cyclones, Women’s College Basketball, Bracket Central
2026 The Athletic Media Company
